"Upon the sacredness of property civilization itself depends—the right of the laborer to his hundred dollars in the savings bank, and equally the legal right of the millionaire to his millions."
"I repudiate with scorn the immoral doctrine, 'Our country, right or wrong'."
"The sound rule in business is that you may give money freely when you have a surplus, but your name never—neither as endorser nor as member of a corporation with individual liability."
The American industrialist Andrew Carnegie (1835-1919) was a fairly typical LIE — the affable, contactable businessman who spotted the economic future a decade ahead of his competitors, who organized entire industries around efficiency principles that didn't yet exist, who gave away 90% of his fortune because the logic that built it also required that it be deployed for maximum social return, and who spent his last years brokenhearted that the most catastrophically inefficient institution in human civilization — war — had arrived despite everything he had built to prevent it (his distance from the Beta quadra values was quite telling here).
Carnegie befriended presidents, railroad magnates, and mill workers with equal ease — not through the SEE's calculated charm but through the LIE's constitutive openness to people as a source of genuine pleasure and useful information simultaneously.
The operational intelligence that built Carnegie Steel was Te-Ni at its most concentrated. He recognized the efficiency implications of the Bessemer process (the first inexpensive industrial method for mass-producing steel from molten pig iron) immediately and adopted it without the LSI's characteristic hostility towards unproven novelties. He introduced detailed cost-and-production accounting procedures that enabled efficiencies no other manufacturing industry had achieved — the closest historical approximation to LIE's defining principle, which he later reduced to an aphorism: "Watch the costs and the profits take care of themselves." He managed through economic incentives rather than volitional pressure, making his key partners wealthy alongside himself — LIE's characteristic preference for economic over dominating methods of managing people and willingess to cooperate with others in business ventures (reflecting a combination of Te and Talanov-De).
The Social-Darwinist dimension of his magnum opus, the Gospel of Wealth, is telling. All four central logicals — SLE, LSI, ILI, and LIE — are prone to social Darwinist thinking in various forms, since all four types share a certain logical coldness about competitive outcomes and a tendency to find structural justifications for existing hierarchies of competence. Carnegie's version is specifically LIE's: forward-oriented and competitive rather than LSI's traditionalist, SLE's dominance-seeking or ILI's "it sucks, but what else can you do" flavor. "While the law of competition may be sometimes hard for the individual, it is best for the race, because it insures the survival of the fittest in every department" (note that race here seems to refer to its older sense of any kind or group). This is Te-logical efficiency applied to social organization — not the defense of inherited privilege (he highly disliked it, in fact) but the argument that competitive selection produces the best allocation of productive capacity. The same logic that justified the Bessemer process justified capitalism: whatever produces the most efficient outcome is best for the long run, regardless of individual cost.
Carnegie wrote at thirty-five, in a private note: "I will spend the first half of this life accumulating money and I will spend the last half of this life giving it all away." He organized his philanthropy as efficiently as his enterprise: 2,509 libraries built worldwide, the Peace Palace in The Hague, the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, Carnegie Mellon University, Carnegie Hall. Each is an institutional solution to a specific problem of social infrastructure, designed to compound in social return across generations. Not ESE's warm direct personal giving but LIE's construction of leverage points that multiply the investment indefinitely. This also reflects Te's attitude to money as a flexible and flowing means of production, not as Se-like resource to be hoarded and possessed. In fact, Carnegie was less Se-ish than many other LIE businessmen with greater accents on the likes of SLE/SEE/LSI. He supported progressive taxation and estate taxes with the same reasoning: dynastic wealth interrupts the meritocratic competition that produces the best outcomes, and should therefore be taxed away. "By taxing estates heavily at death the state marks its condemnation of the selfish millionaire's unworthy life." His meritocratic convictions were sincere and personal — he had been the boy sweeping out the office himself. "It is not the rich man's son that the young struggler for advancement has to fear in the race of life... Look out for the dark horse in the boy who begins by sweeping out the office."
The pacifism of his later years is perhaps the most revealing single dimension of his character because it is the least expected and the most discriminating against alternative typings. Carnegie's opposition to war was systematic and sustained — he funded the Peace Palace, established the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace with $10 million specifically to hasten the abolition of international war, cultivated Roosevelt's mediation of the Russo-Japanese War, and spent the last decade of his life in increasingly desperate attempts to prevent the conflict he could see approaching. He died in August 1919, two months after the Treaty of Versailles, brokenhearted that his efforts had failed. This is not Fi-leads moral revulsion at violence or even the romanticism of some more "peripheral" EIE's — it is LIE's recognition that war is systematically inefficient and produces worse outcomes than available alternatives.
As one of the leading quotes shows, Carnegie was concerned about his business reputation — a sign of LIE's Fi-valuing, and one of the common traits with LIE's dual ESI. But the Homestead Strike of 1892 — the most damaging episode in his reputation — illustrates LIE's characteristic moral compartmentalization. Carnegie was in Scotland when Henry Clay Frick broke the Amalgamated Association of Iron, Steel, and Tin Workers using the infamous Pinkerton agents and state militia, leaving seven workers and three guards dead. Carnegie had empowered Frick to do what was necessary; he maintained personal distance from the means while approving the ends. He called the violence "deplorable" while pleading ignorance of the specifics. But the compartmentalization itself is telling: not SLE's indifference to the human cost or LSI's procedural justification of institutional authority, but LIE's cold recognition that the system requires certain things combined with an uncomfortable awareness that this recognition has limits the type would prefer not to examine.
Comments
Post a Comment