"I had no Monarch in my life, and cannot rule myself, and when I try to organize – my little Force explodes – and leaves me bare and charred."
"Hope" is the thing with feathers –
That perches in the soul –
And sings the tune without the words –
And never stops – at all –
And sweetest – in the Gale – is heard –
And sore must be the storm –
That could abash the little Bird
That kept so many warm –
I've heard it in the chillest land –
And on the strangest Sea –
Yet – never – in Extremity,
It asked a crumb – of me.
"I'm Nobody! Who are you? / Are you — Nobody — too?" The poem is often read as charming self-deprecation. It is also a precise self-description: the pleasure of being unknown, of existing outside the social machinery that requires you to be somebody for somebody else's purposes. Emily Dickinson (1830-1886) spent the last two decades of her life within the bounds of the family property in Massachusetts, spoke to visitors through doors and from behind stairwells, and left nearly 1,800 poems to be discovered by her sister after her death. She had been offered publication more than once and declined. She was, in Talanov-style vocabulary of her type, a person of passive reflection rather than lively active action, and she organized her entire existence around protecting that reflective interiority from the external world. Really, she was quite close to the boundary between IEI and ILI, and an ILI typing isn't totally out of question for her.
The IEI's primary orientation is toward the inner ethical and emotional world, and in Dickinson this orientation was so complete that it became the organizing principle of a life. Her poems are not "objective" descriptions of the world in any way, are transcripts of the emotional and cognitive states produced by encountering it — grief, anticipation, the precise phenomenology of dying ("I heard a fly buzz when I died...", a fascination linked to Ni as a function of future prediction), the feeling of time bending around a remembered moment. "After great pain, a formal feeling comes." It is a report from inside an emotional experience, rendered with the clinical precision of someone who has been paying very close attention to the interior. The core temperament is a lyricist dreamer's — the inward turn, the imaginative life more vivid than the outer one, the self-dramatizing posture, the melancholy aestheticized into art, the clear and pronounced taste for suffering as a subject.
But IEI alone does not explain Dickinson. The pure IEI portrait — suggestible, oriented toward strong dominant personalities, avoiding logical complexity — misses something essential in her. Her poems are more compressed that simply vague. She is leaving out the connective tissue because it is obvious to anyone paying attention, and Dickinson had no patience for the obvious. "Tell all the truth but tell it slant." This is not an IEI sentiment alone. The ILI accent — the cold analytical streak, the pessimistic orientation (although IEI is already quite a dubious "positivist"), the preference for inner critical examination over outward performance — sharpens the IEI emotional material into something that cuts colder.
The ILI contribution is audible throughout. Dickinson often tends to a near-clinical autopsy and emotional detachment which is more ILI. "Because I could not stop for Death / He kindly stopped for me." She was attracted to strong older men of outstanding intellectual or rhetorical skills, which fits the IEI's orientation toward dominant personalities as complements; but she engaged with their ideas on her own terms and corresponded with them as an equal.
Her famous line to Higginson — "When I state myself as the representative of the verse, it does not mean me but a supposed person" — reflects a trait the IEI type is well known for: the ability to easily inhabit another role, to run oneself as a character rather than a self. And yet the sentence itself — the cool, technical, disambiguating precision of it, the poet calmly explaining to a bewildered correspondent that his confusion rests on a category error — is characteristic of the ILI overlay. An unmixed IEI might have written it as a lament or a mystery. Dickinson wrote it as a logical correction.
Her reclusion was born, as the Project MUSE website puts it, "in reaction against a world manifesting itself as unpredictable, violent, and terrifying". It is the withdrawal of a person for whom the external social world offered less than the internal one, and for whom the US Civil War provided overwhelming confirmation that the world was, as she had long suspected, badly run.
Despite her physical seclusion, Dickinson was expressive in correspondence. This matters for the typing: she was not indifferent to people. The IEI's capacity for emotional identification meant she held her correspondents intensely, almost tenaciously, in her imagination. She sent poems with flowers, lowered treats to children from an upstairs window, maintained decades-long epistolary relationships of extraordinary depth. What she refused was the social performance — the physical presence, the small talk, the management of other people's impressions.
The herbarium she assembled as a teenager — hundreds of pressed plants, catalogued in Latin — is often cited as biographical curiosity. In socionics terms, this is definitely closer to more "rational" and more classification-loving ILI than to IEI. She grew out of that particular project, but the underlying impulse — to find the exact word, the precise formal container for a formless experience, to compress rather than expand — never left her.
Dickinson was a deep introvert, while Aushra's nickname for the IEI type, Sergei Yesenin, was likely inverted to extraversion. Dickinson's deep introversion also helps explain why the ILI accent reads so strongly in her: it reinforces the shared introverted-reflective tendencies of both types and mutes the social-emotional reaching-outward that a more typical IEI would show. However, note that both poets still liked to contemplate the (largely negative) change of internal state with time and lyrical melancholy.
"My beautiful melancholy" is how the IEI profile characterizes the type's characteristic mood. Plus the lowered basket of cakes and poems for neighborhood children, the "Called Back" on the gravestone — all of this is the deliberate curation of a myth. An ILI alone would not bother that much; the myth-construction is IEI. But the execution — tight, controlled, decades-long, never breaking character — had the discipline of the other side of her. She was conscious of the image she was crafting, and she crafted it the way she did everything else: from inside, alone, on her own terms, and without explaining herself to anyone. It's no accident that Ni is described as the most "mysterious" of functions, even if the Talanov-style evolutionary explanation for this is quite unflattering (the adaptation of a weak subject to a competitive reality leads to a desire to cover one's tracks and to glamorization of it).
"To live is so startling, it leaves little time for anything else."
Comments
Post a Comment