Park Chung-hee: LSI with an accent on LIE

    "But the challenge must be faced squarely. I believe we can overcome it through our own efforts. We must do so. They key is our national power. Take courage from our national pride and traditions, no matter how thorny the road to independence may be."

    Park Chung-hee (1917-1979) ruled South Korea for eighteen years, and the consequences of his rule are still seen in the country today, with opinions still divided. Under his rule the initially poor country became a major world economy — in other words, he was what politologists can a "developmental dictator". His contribution to the regime he created was a combination of methodical long-range planning, iron discipline, institutionalized repression, and personal frugality. His sociotype was, if anything, very fitting to his historical role: its core was LSI — the military-disciplinarian, order-imposing, hierarchy-preserving structural mind. The LIE accent accounts for his forward-looking developmental vision, obsessive business-efficiency orientation, and relentless eighteen-hour workdays. 

    What establishes the LSI core is visible from the earliest stages of his career and holds steady for the rest of his life. Park was formed as a Japanese colonial-era military officer, served in the Imperial Japanese Army in Manchukuo, and carried the military ethos of that system into every later office he held. The type's description emphasizes subordination to an hierarchical chain of command, high tolerance for monotonous activities, and a preference for methodical rationalization and structuring of the work process, with the mandatory division of all work into stages. The Five-Year Economic Plans — four of them under Park's direct supervision, each with targeted sectors advancing in designated sequence from light industry through heavy and chemical industry to high technology — are an almost pure expression of this kind of mind. So is the Economic Planning Board, the Confucian-military master-student framework he deliberately installed between the state and the chaebols (family companies supported by the state), and the intelligence agency, KCIA, which existed specifically to prevent counter-coups and suppress any force capable of disturbing the established order. Labor rights were suppressed to maintain export-led industrialization, with labor activists often deemed communist sympathizers. All this was done with the ruthlessness typical of highly "central" logicals (and Park was a highly "central" character, no doubt). He met the same ruthless end — Park's KCIA director Kim Jae-gyu shot him at close range during a dinner, reportedly after Park had criticized him for failing to suppress the protests — South Korean masses, once their prosperity increased, were getting restless under Park's rule. Kim Jae-gyu insisted on his trial that he was motivated by the people's suffering. Nevertheless, he was succeeded by another dictatorial regime, and it was only in late 1980'ies RoK became a fairly "proper" democracy.

    The austerity of his personal life is the most remarked-upon feature of his personality by contemporaries. He resoled his old shoes rather than buy new ones. He drank unfiltered Korean rice wine rather than the imported Western liquor his subordinates brought him as gifts. He made a point of using Korean-made products. The one American ambassador quote that historians cite most often describes him as "aloof, authoritarian and disdainful" — a man who "demanded respect, not popularity." This is exact. The type's characteristic strong self-control is exactly what every observer noticed: the impassive bearing, the Ray-Ban sunglasses, the humorlessness, the refusal of the populist manner liked by many other dictators.

    In private, Park could be unexpectedly sentimental sometimes — biographers note that he "loved dogs", could write poetic lines in his diary about falling autumn leaves, and had a private life somewhat less miserly than the public image (he did hold late-night parties with young women and drank with his inner circle). His lifelong attachment to the biographies of Admiral Yi Sun-sin and Napoleon, which he read voraciously as a poor boy and which clearly shaped his self-image, fits the pattern of his type. Even his childhood poor appetite (the LSI/LIE combination is notoriously anti-Si) and stoic willingness to run the long way to his school in winter bear marks of his type. In general, the LSI/LIE mixed type is one of the best in suppressing the demands of own body for a greater goal. 

    The authoritarian structure of his rule is where LSI's more specific tendencies show up. Park's 1972 Yushin Constitution (which you received a long prison term for opposing) is a near-textbook expression of this. It gave him unlimited presidential terms, dissolved meaningful electoral competition, and built a surveillance apparatus that monitored classrooms, banned miniskirts, controlled labor, and jailed dissidents. He justified it, characteristically, on the grounds that Korea was "in the top-knot and horsehair hat stage of old" and could not be changed overnight through democratic means. The creation of the KCIA in the first month of his rule, specifically to suppress potential enemies both domestic and foreign, is also characteristic of the type and its affection for special services. Park's comfort with formal authority, his insistence on respect rather than popularity, his willingness to impose Yushin — all of this is the LSI side of the mix, and it's what distinguishes him from a pure LIE, who'd be a technocratic-entrepreneurial leader without the hierarchical-disciplinarian streak. For Park, the military dictator side and the industrial futurist side went in concert.

    The LIE accent expressed itself in the efficient and forward-thinking nature of Park's entire economic program. The Five-Year Plans themselves were an LSI tool used for an LIE purpose: the sequential, stage-by-stage, hierarchical discipline of LSI deployed in service of forward-looking business development. His slogan — "We can achieve anything if we work hard enough" — is the LIE voice (it's no accident the type is the Workaholic No. 2 of the socion). The ruthless future-focus is quite reflective of the type's rational-logicalcons-central traits. Park lived in planning grids years ahead of the present moment, a typical reflection of strengthened Ni in its "creative", rational form, combined with additional weakening of Si. 

    The same accent explains the specific shape of his relationship with the chaebols. An LSI without the LIE accent might have subordinated business to state discipline in a more static, bureaucratic way. Park did subordinate them — he had several of the wealthiest businessmen arrested after the 1961 coup to make the point about who was in charge — but then released them conditionally to build industries of his choosing, backed by the state's control over foreign credit and the Foreign Capital Inducement Deliberation Committee. The businessmen were to be harnessed, not suppressed. This is LIE logic: identify the productive force, set it up with incentive structures and protected markets, and ride its profit-hunting motivation toward the national goal. The Park model that the chaebols grew out of — Hyundai, Samsung, LG, all built during his rule on state-guaranteed credit — is LIE strategy inside an LSI container. In general, the archetype of a developmentalist dictator is somewhere between these two types. Others, like Lee Kuan Yew, also likely were in-between them, although the precise arrangement of the main type and the accent might differ. 

    The combination also accounts for something that biographers have found genuinely odd about Park, which is the almost total absence of personalistic corruption. He was a dictator who tortured dissidents and suspended the constitution; he was also, by every account, not personally enriched by his rule, and not the kind of kleptocrat that comparable figures (Marcos is the usual comparison) tended to become. 


    Comments