"I am not so much afraid either of Democracy or of Science as of the love of money. This seems to me to be a growing evil. Also, there is a danger from the growth of that dreadful military spirit".
"I absorb the vapour and return it as a flood."
William Ewart Gladstone (1809-1898) — four-time Prime Minister, the greatest orator of the Victorian age, author of twenty thousand books read and twenty-five thousand diary entries written — presents what looks at first like a paradox: a Prima Donna of conscience, a man whose political career was defined by radical reform and popular mobilization, and whose personal character was defined by rigid moral conservatism, volcanic inner conflict, and a capacity for self-punishment that bordered on the pathological. The paradox dissolves once the type is identified.
Roy Jenkins, his best biographer, noted that "Gladstone, like de Gaulle, was conceited rather than vain." The distinction is typologically revealing. Vanity is the need for others' admiration, the self-image calibrated to social feedback. Conceit is different: the deep, largely internal conviction of one's own significance, which persists independent of whether others confirm it. Gladstone didn't need approval in the way a vain man does. He needed to be internally right.
The ESI case is built on the moral architecture of his life. His private diaries — maintained from the age of eighteen almost to his death — are an exhaustive record of spiritual audit: sins catalogued, virtues assessed, failures confessed, penances imposed. He practiced self-flagellation when he judged himself to have fallen short, in a combination of ESI moralism and EIE masochism. He recorded in careful notation the precise nature of the temptation each encounter with a prostitute had provoked, and whether he had successfully resisted it. This less EIE's theatrical self-dramatization and more ESI's intensely private, relentlessly exacting conscience, the moral ledger kept not for posterity but for God, and for the self. His friend John Morley claimed that "nobody had fewer secrets, nobody ever lived and wrought in fuller sunlight."
The rather dubious and wacky "rescue work" — hundreds of late-night excursions across decades, seeking out prostitutes on London's streets to lead them back to virtue — was the most controversial expression of this ESI moralism. The Oxford academic summary of his life puts it with characteristic understatement: "His longest crusade was against the enemy within." He was drawn to these women, recorded the temptation with painful precision, continued the work anyway, and subjected himself to punishment when he judged he had indulged the draw too far. This is ESI's moral individualism at its most extreme.
One of Gladstone's most famous quotes is "There should be a sympathy with freedom, a desire to give it scope, founded not upon visionary ideas, but upon the long experience of many generations..." is almost a direct statement of ESI's epistemological orientation. You can see from this blog's entry on common conflictor traits that both ILE and ESI have some suspicuous-of-state-repression liberal leanings, but ILE's liberalism flows from Ne's generative vision of possibilities — things could be otherwise, new configurations are imaginable, the future can be designed. ESI's liberalism, where it exists, flows from accumulated relational and historical experience — this is what has actually worked, this is what the tradition has learned through practice, this is what has earned its place.
His remark, "I am certain, from experience, of the immense advantage of strict account-keeping in early life" - shows an example of valued Te, and creative-Se (all ESI traits) is also quite good at keeping material things.
"As to his Goddess Reason," — Gladstone once wrote — "I understand by it simply an adoption of what are called on the continent the principles of the French Revolution. These we neither want nor warmly relish in England" - this, I think, shows his hostility to Alpha-NT values, despite the liberal bent. The explicit identification of abstract rationalist liberalism with continental revolutionary principles, and the equally explicit rejection of both on English traditionalist grounds, is ESI refusing Alpha-NT abstraction with characteristic directness.
"I am a Free Trader on moral no less than on economic grounds: for I think human greed and selfishness are interwoven with every thread of the Protective system" — he once remarked. The policy position that would look purely Te-economic to a LSE or (especially) LIE is here explicitly grounded in moral judgment.
The very strong EIE accent explains what ESI alone cannot — the extraordinary public dimension of a character that was in so many ways intensely private. Gladstone was not merely a moral man; he was a man who understood instinctively that moral conviction could be broadcast, that emotion was contagious, that the masses could be moved. The Midlothian campaigns of 1879-80 were something genuinely new in British politics — a senior statesman taking his case directly to the people, speaking to audiences of thousands, packaging complex foreign policy arguments as moral crusades, generating what one observer called "evangelical fire." Only Gladstone, it was said, could make a budget sound like the announcement of a crusade. His five-hour budget speech of 1853, which the diarist Charles Greville called "one of the grandest displays and most able financial statement that ever was heard in the House of Commons," was EIE's theatrical performance of moral and intellectual authority — the feeling of historical significance broadcast to an audience that felt it too. "Pure" ESI is a far more reserved and "domestic" character than this.
The combination produces the specific texture of Gladstone's prickliness. ESI is prickly from moral absolutism — the conscience that cannot bend to social pressure, that records its judgments in the private ledger and acts on them regardless of convenience. EIE is prickly from historical self-consciousness — the sense of unique mission, the intolerance of those who fail to grasp what is at stake, the bristling response to opposition that seems not merely wrong but morally obtuse. Gladstone was prickly in both registers simultaneously. Queen Victoria found him "insufferable" and complained that he addressed her as if she were a public meeting (and this more is EIE than ESI). His Cabinet colleagues found him overwhelming, impossible to divert, impossible to manage. He was not a comfortable man. He was respected as a Chancellor and feared as an orator, Jenkins noted, but "not revered or loved as a leader." The combination of ethical-emotional rigidity ("constructivism" in Socionics parlance) and questimity (narrow range of acceptable) produces quite intrasigent characters, indeed. When it comes to secondary functions, introduced by the socionist Talanov, Gladstone clearly combined high Qi (separation of individuality) with high Qe (separation of elitism).
The career trajectory also makes ESI/EIE sense. He began as a High Tory, defending the Established Church and the existing constitutional order with the same moral intensity he would later bring to Irish Home Rule and opposition to imperialism. The political positions changed dramatically over sixty years in public life; the underlying moral architecture never did. He followed his conscience past every tribal loyalty — from Toryism to Liberalism, from initially being sympathetic to the concerns of the Caribbean slaveowners to championing the oppressed Irish, from orthodox Anglicanism to positions his own party found ruinously unconventional. ESI doesn't change its moral framework to suit the party; the party must keep up with the conscience.
Disraeli — his great adversary, the charmer, the pragmatist, the wit — found Gladstone's moral intensity both baffling and useful. "He has not a single redeeming defect," Disraeli said of him. It's the perfect view of ESI/EIE — the man whose theatrical moral seriousness is itself, from a certain angle, a kind of flaw.
Of other socionists, Jack Aaron of WSS also considers Gladstone to have been an ESI, although he makes no mention of the EIE component, which was almost as important in the statesman's personality. For more historical characters of the same mixed type, see Leo Tolstoy.
Comments
Post a Comment